Thursday, February 10, 2011

EMR: No Shortage in Standards

As we transition to a full EMR system, one of the largest current challenges to our health care model is the need to share information at different sites: hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, tertiary care centers, etc. To help facilitate this interoperability between health care sites, standards are needed to guide us towards this end.

Even to begin to set such standards and/or goals towards interoperability, there first must first be a focus to aggregate patient data towards a unified standard. In setting the stage for this ‘consensus’ standard, all stake holders who represent some specific arm of medicine must come together and define the standards that allow them to work together across sites and distances.

Many of these respective groups that create standards have a tight relationship; some have absolutely no connection whatsoever. Thus, it’s easy to see this creates an inherent redundancy in standards in some areas of gap in others. Such redundancy and scattered coverage in standards have created the need for harmonization.


The graphic above represents the 43 major international health care standard developing organizations (SDO's) that are working together to create seamless interoperability. Many of these organizations have a need for assistance, and are free to join and have openings for volunteer opportunities. If you are interested in breaking into HealthIT, anyone of these organizations could mark the start of your transition towards this career.

As I continue to navigate through my HITECH program, I will continue to highlight many of these organizations and give you a bird's eye view of their role in the EMR interoperability equation. If you'd like to learn more about EMR transition and the mountain we are facing, click here.

About the author:

Mehdi Rais is a physician, medical lecturer, medical writer, and self-proclaimed “tech nerd.” When Dr. Rais isn’t honing in on his trades, he spends his time scouring publications and the web for the latest trends in technology in the medical field, new applications in Health Information Technology, and emerging legislative & regulatory changes in medicine.

Dr. Rais' interests are greatly focused in the realm of mobile computing and the use of cell phone technologies in the clinical setting. He received his Medical Doctorate from St. Christopher’s College of Medicine after spending his undergraduate years at the University of Texas at Dallas.

Dr. Rais can be reached on LinkedIn or followed at his blog here. Look for him on Twitter @DrMedBlog.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

EMR Transition: It's all in the Words....

Seamless care through EMR requires establishing interoperability between different systems (i.e. organizations, hospitals, clinics, networks, etc.)  The starting point for achieving this interoperability is producing a controlled vocabulary to input within a database.  Naturally, over time development organizations have created such data sets in vocabulary for the specific aim to explain a specific arm of medicine.  Gradually, these organizations have broadened their purpose to encompass all medical terminology.  With this in mind, it is important to note that none of these initial data sets were ever intended to cover all of medicine and thus the reason we have overlap in terminologies, descriptions, etc.

If one were to simply take a look at a single term/data set and the variance in definitions of this term, it would be easy to see how the transition to EMR could effectively come to a grinding halt in its attempts to achieve complete interoperability.  A recent study examined the term myocardial infarction (MI). We all have our own conceptual model of MI and a respective qualitative/quantitative description to fit this model. The study I am referring to found 60 different scientific definitions of myocardial infarction.  Take this example one step further, and imagine the EMR interoperability nightmare if the records of one MI patient had to seek care or advice from a different institution. The flow of that data set from one institution to the next would immediately be severed simply because of the differing definitions and descriptors given. Now multiply this problem by every diagnosable disease.  The thought of standardization of language and disease description becomes a staggering one, and here lies the mountain of work we must climb to achieve seamless EMR interoperability.

To put this into further perspective, the following table elaborates the choices in terminology for specific recordable data sets and the respective organizations that are attempting to develop a controlled language.  While there may be overlap in some of the language in one or two of the systems, there is by no means a consensus language. 
 '+' represents the amount of use of a controlled terminology set within the U.S.; '$' represents a respective cost to the end user.
Having said this, clinicians cannot sit back and simply think that EMR transition will be done by IT people alone.  Definitions and vocabulary are the back bone of this system. Such terminology can only be given by clinicians.  Currently the Office of the National Coordinator estimates 50,000 people will be needed to assist in this effort over the next 4-5 years to reach our goal of 100% transition to EMR.  

I for one had no idea of the scale of the interoperability problems without having started the HITECH Workforce Program only a few weeks back.  I look forward to presenting many more of the big issues that we are facing during this EMR transition in the coming months.  


About the author:

Mehdi Rais is a physician, medical lecturer, medical writer, and self-proclaimed “tech nerd.” When Dr. Rais isn’t honing in on his trades, he spends his time scouring publications and the web for the latest trends in technology in the medical field, new applications in Health Information Technology, and emerging legislative & regulatory changes in medicine. 

Dr. Rais' interests are greatly focused in the realm of mobile computing and the use of cell phone technologies in the clinical setting.  He received his Medical Doctorate from St. Christopher’s College of Medicine after spending his undergraduate years at the University of Texas at Dallas.  

Dr. Rais can be reached on LinkedIn or followed at his blog here. Look for him on Twitter @DrMedBlog.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Blood Pressure Showdown: Withings vs iHealth

You've read a few reviews on iOs enabled blood pressure cuffs breaking into the market (here, here, and here.)  I was interested in taking a closer look at the devices available and their respective hardware and user interface.  In the following chart, you'll find some pretty big differences between the offerings of the two main manufacturer's (iHealth and Withings) in terms of power, user interface, ability to share, analytical capabilities, and more....


SPEC COMPARISON

With Specs in mind, let's take a quick glimpse at the hardware package and UI.

WITHINGS BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF & APP: 
A look at the size and portability of Withing's product.
UI while acquiring blood pressure
Blood Pressure results display
Graphical results of blood pressure readings


iHealth's BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF, BASE & APP:

Despite the base station, iHealth's offering is still highly portable.

UI while acquiring blood pressure. 
Blood pressure results


Graphical interpretation of blood pressure data. 

Determining a champion in this showdown is really a matter of personal preference.  If you or your patients need a product that offers dynamic avenues to share, Withings is your product.  If you need a more robust and appealing UI and user experience, iHealth gets the nod.  At the end of the day, you can't lose with either product.  

Which one will you be advising your patients to grab?

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Android Releases More Honeycomb Details

Author: Mehdi Rais, M.D.

previously highlighted the upcoming Android release of the Honeycomb platform (version 3.0).  Android's latest rendition is primarily aimed to work on larger screens such as tablets.  Google has promised big changes to the UI design, a more robust multitasking engine, more widgets, and greater capabilities in customization.  Yesterday, the Android developer team released some early screen shots of things to come. Here are a few of my favorite updates to the platform.


UI Overhaul
The Android Developer team has long sought to make the user experience more intuitive with less effort.  To do this, they have drastically made changes to the core UI design.  In all applications at the bottom of the screen, the user will have quick access to system status notifications and a soft navigation button in the system bar.  At the top of the screen in every application, an action bar will have contextual options, navigation, widgets, and alternate content in an action bar. 

Home is where the hearts are
One of the complaints of Android’s current platform (version 2.2) is a single home screen, which leaves the user with a very restrictive experience due to the limited number of readily available functions; the user is required to navigate through multiple menus and screens to reach a desired function.  While this seems to work fine on a smaller device such as a cellular phone, the tablet does not seem to not take full advantage of the additional screen space and hardware capabilities. 

To remedy this, the user will have five customizable home screens in Honeycomb.  Furthermore, the user can spatially arrange widgets, app shortcuts, web pages, search boxes, and wallpaper to their own desire.  These home screens will dynamically change according to the orientation of the device.


Multitasking Wiz
The system bar has a nice added feature coined the Recent App List. The user can access recently opened or closed apps and jump to them quickly and painlessly.


Redesigned keyboard and text function
  • Keys were redesigned and positioned to make for a more intuitive and accurate experience.
  • New keys were added to increase efficiency of input (i.e. Tab key.)
  • Users can toggle between a text and voice input mode.  Not much more information was given by the Android developer team, but I am highly interested in seeing this demonstrated.
  • Android promises a better copy and paste experience.  Users can press and hold a word then adjust the selection by dragging floating arrow boundaries around the desired text; the selected text can then be copy and pasted within the text box, sent to the clip board, or pasted to a web or local search.
These early previews are very compelling.  I can’t say for certain if this experience will be as fluid and dynamic as the iPad experience, but I can say the folks at Android are definitely pointed in the right direction.


About the author:

Mehdi Rais is a physician, medical lecturer, medical writer, and self-proclaimed “tech nerd.” When Dr. Rais isn’t honing in on his trades, he spends his time scouring publications and the web for the latest trends in technology in the medical field, new applications in Health Information Technology, and emerging legislative & regulatory changes in medicine. 

Dr. Rais' interests are greatly focused in the realm of mobile computing and the use of cell phone technologies in the clinical setting.  He received his Medical Doctorate from St. Christopher’s College of Medicine after spending his undergraduate years at the University of Texas at Dallas.  

Dr. Rais can be reached on LinkedIn or followed at his blog here. Look for him on Twitter @DrMedBlog.


Sunday, January 30, 2011

Qualify to Become a Medical Science Liaison

I recently took a snap shot of the top 10 posters for MSL (medical science liaison) positions on Monster.comHotjobs.com,  and CareerBuilder.com.  After boiling down the job descriptions for core qualifications of MSL job posts, I found a consistent list of attributes employers are seeking in candidates.  

By no means is this an end-all list for guaranteed employment as an MSL.  Consider this a starting point.  Acquiring these attributes and exhibiting them purposefully in your CV will only help increase your chances of breaking in: 
  • Education: MD, PharmD, PhD
  • Skills: Clinical presentation, medical education development, and an overall thought development leader. Individual must have solid computer skills (spreadsheets, word processing, database, internet research and other applicable software programs.)
  • Experience: 3-5 years in a specific area with strong knowledge of the treatment landscape for one's field of specialty.
  • Personal Attributes: leadership, interpersonal, analytical and problem solving skills. Candidate must be energetic and possess excellent communication skills (oral and written.) In addition, he or she  must be  highly self-motivated such that he/she can work in an independent environment.
  • Social Attributes: membership into the national society of preferred disease specialty. Individual will be able to demonstrate a well-established network in this specific network.
  • Travel: 6 weekends a year up to 80% travel. Most are required to live within a given territory.
If you are trying to break into the MSL field, do you qualify?  If not what are you doing about it?


Monday, January 24, 2011

The HITECH Workforce Progam: A Free & Fast Education in EMR Implementation

Today I began a six month certificate plan in the HITECH Workforce Program.  The program is a pivotal piece to the recently passed HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act with specific aims:
  • Nationwide adoption of Electronic Health Records
  • Information exchange across health care providers and public health authorities
  • Redesign of workflows within health care settings to gain quality and efficient benefits of EHR
  • EHR Transition while maintaining privacy and security of medical information.
The program was designed to cross-train individuals in health care and Information Technology (IT).  Those with a medical background (most of us), will have a primary focus on IT issues (networks, databases, and programming) and those with an IT background will focus on health care issues.  As an incentive to increase enrollment, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the National Coordinator is offering 100% tuition reimbursement for those who finish the program within 6 months until funding runs out. 

The training curriculum was developed by industry leaders and educators at Duke University, University of Alabama, Oregon Health Sciences University, Columbia University and Johns Hopkins University. This uniform curriculum is based online with all reading material, power point presentations, quizzes, etc. made available through Blackboard at approved regional sites

There is a real need for health care professionals like ourselves to dive into this program.  According to the Labor Bureau of Labor statistics and the Department of Education, the federal mandate for nation-wide implementation of Electronic Health Records by 2015 will require 50,000 qualified health information technology workers. 

In projecting these numbers, several workforce roles have already been identified.  Among the applicable ones to health care workers (others exist for IT) include:
  • Clinician/Practitioner Consultant
  • Practice workflow and information Management Redesign Specialist
  • Implementation Support Specialist
  • Implementation Manager
Employers for these roles can include but are not limited to health care facilities, vendors, state/city public health agencies, and regional extension centers.  The members of these roles will be considered of mobile adoption support and will help implement at the aforementioned sites and upon completion will move on to new locations. 

If you enjoy traveling, a highly variable work environment and different daily challenges, this may be just for you.  As the course progresses, I will run down the responsibilities for each applicable role, suggested background, projected pay, and typical education. In addition I hope to give you my impressions of the course.

For more information on the program, click here.



Friday, January 21, 2011

The Ever So Hip Hip Implant

Total hip implants have made their way into mainstream media of late. Such attention has been raised because one company that focuses on hip replacement solutions, Depuy, is facing the grim reality that 12.5% of its hip implants (ASR XL or ASR Hip Resurfacing Systems) has failed according to an August 2010 study.  The  news for DePuy's parent company, Johnson & Johnson, seems to get worse when one considers the staggering number of U.S. citizens (100,000) that received the implant between 2005 and 2010.   Johnson & Johnson has set the stage for a massive voluntary recall of the two implant systems in which they will pick up the costs for monitoring, clinical visits, revision operations, and follow up.

With hip replacement surgeries having been around since 1960, advancements in surgical techniques and equipment have improved the outcomes for most patients to its highest levels.  Currently 193,000 hip replacements occur every year in the United States, making it one of the more common orthopedic procedures.  

Having said this, I'd like to take a step back from the main stream media's focus in this issue, and discuss the anatomical considerations for a total hip replacement, what indications are considered,  and how an implant works.

ANATOMY

The  hip is a ball and socket joint which is made up respectfully of the head of the femur bone (femoral head) and the acetabulum, a bony concave surface that dives into the pelvis.  With these two boney structures so closely related, resistance to movement can occur in the form of friction if they were to become in direct contact (see Problem Hip.)  To decrease this, the synovial membrane lubricates the space between these structures to help promote free movement while articular cartilage assists in cushioning the joint.


As the hip joint serves as one of the heaviest weight bearing joints in the body, its structural integrity is of infinite importance in day-to-day movements.  A few associated structures that help ensure this include:
  • Capsule: located and attached just outside the acetabular rim is a fibrous lip that surrounds the neck of the femur.  Its function is to help promote a wide range of motion while assisting in weight bearing activities.
  • Ligaments are a fibrous dense tissue that form a connection between bones and play a major role in helping solidify the integrity of a joint.  In our case of the hip, we have two main ligament groups that help reinforce:
    1. Extracapsular: includes three ligaments that strengthen the capsule and prevent excessive range of motion in the joint.
    2. Intracapsular: think inside the capsule. The main function here is to prevent further displacement of the femoral head in the event of a hip dislocation.
With an intact hip, the lower limbs are permitted to do four main movements:

Hip Abduction
          Hip Extension

With this proper functioning system in mind, a lot of things can go wrong that would lead a patient to need hip implant surgery.  Research has shown that 85% of patients with total hip replacement have a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (the most common joint abnormality) or a form of inflammatory arthritis (mainly rheumatoid arthritis.)  Let's examine these two factors in our investigation of the Total Hip Replacement.

OSTEOARTHRITIS (OA)
In this disease, the joint becomes compromised by years of “wear and tear.”  Think of the joint as becoming worn down and losing it's mechanical efficiencies with degradation in cartilage, bone and a build up of fibrous tissue. This increase in mechanical stress will come at a cost with increased friction and resistance to movement. Major causes of OA include a family history of osteoarthritis, being overweight, trauma to the joint itself, and long term over use.  


Symptoms of OA include deep aching joint pain that gets worse after activity and relieved with initiating rest.  As the condition progresses, pain becomes more prevalent during rest and eventually does not subside.  Additionally, patients may suffer from limited movement, grating (cracking) of joint on movement, muscle weakness around the joint, and joint swelling.  

A physical exam can demonstrate grating, joint swelling, limited range of motion, tenderness when pressed and pain with normal movement. 

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA)
RA is considered of autoimmune origin.  Normally the immune system recognizes foreign or impaired self cells and attacks them to prevent their harmful effects.  In RA, the immune system recognizes normal cells as being foreign invaders and attacks and attempts to eliminate them.  RA can affect other joints and organs and generally does so bilaterally unlike osteoarthritis.   


Symptoms of RA include:
  • Fatigue loss of appetite
  • Morning stiffness
  • Generalized muscle aches and weakness
  • Unlike OA, as the joint becomes more used and “warmed up” the pain subsides.  

INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY:
Knowing these two main causes of degeneration of this joint, we can begin to understand the clinical picture presented to the orthopedic surgeon and how the recommendation is made for total hip replacement.  

Generally speaking, the severity of symptoms and degree of disability will dictate the indication.  Pain that has advanced into previous times where it was non-existent (during rest in OA; during activity in RA) plays an important factor.  

Functional limitations are also a key component to the surgical indication formula, but alone are not an indication for surgery.  With OA, walking and stair climbing become increasingly difficult with increased pain and decreased range of motion. Simple daily routines such as putting on one's shoes become massive hurdles in the course of the day.  In RA, these functional limitations are even more exaggerated and occur bilaterally more often than OA, which is more a unilateral clinical picture.  

Both these symptoms of pain and functional limitations are improved with surgery and the patient can often see a return to previous 'normal' levels in as little as three months post operatively.  With this understanding of the environment and indications for surgery, tomorrow we will discuss how a total hip replacement works.